Patrick C Wrote:

Ben Holmes Wrote:If Bugliosi spent over 20 years studying the evidence, yet was unaware of one of the most critical and devastating facts that tends to show a conspiracy, how can he be trusted for anything he says about the case?

I think that is a very subjective view.

I listed two facts.



#1 - Bugliosi spent over 20 years studying the evidence.



#2 - Bugliosi failed to understand a very basic bit of medical evidence.



Which one was "subjective," Patrick?



I stated that "I predict that NO believer will specifically address this question." - looks like I was perfectly correct.



And despite asking Patrick what was "subjective" - he has avoided this question for years...



via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-Subjectivity-And-Patrick-Collins