Patrick C wrote:

Patrick C wrote:An opinion that isn't very credible, judging by your previous proven lying on the topic of this case.

Once again you call me I liar. This is getting to become a daily accusation and ill founded. It is thuggish, rather ignorant behaviour on your part Holmes. Not really my cup of tea - and that is being polite.



So I think for the time being at least, enjoy your forum and enjoy the self indulgent back patting with your fellow crackpots. I might check in once in a while for a laugh and I might make a post with the other guys.... But anyway I expect the number of posts will now deservedly drop somewhat!

Not unexpected...



Most WCR Supporters will never enter this forum. John McAdams, for example; learned long ago that he cannot debate me in a forum he doesn't control. David Von Pein has made it clear he'll never post here... I'm sure Henry has dropped in, but knows better than to try to debate in a forum where there's no personal attacks allowed.



This is a frequent tactic of WCR Supporters... when the going gets rough, they simply disappear.



Quite frankly, I think they're doing the only possible thing they can do... and I don't blame 'em at all...



But if the evidence were in their favor, this wouldn't be a useful tactic.



All you're doing, Patrick; is proving that there's no honest way to defend the Warren Commission's theory - using the EVIDENCE in this case...



And I'm happy with that.

Statistics: Posted by Ben Holmes — Sun Jul 24, 2016 4:59 pm

---

via ConspiracyJFKForum.com http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=102&p=958#p958