David Talbot
*[1] http://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content...plaint.pdf
*[2] http://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content...Ruling.pdf
Source: https://www.courthousenews.com/kennedy-a...c-federal/
via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-David-Talbot
Posted on April 13th, 2017
Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #40 Refuted.
Chain of custody issues raise their ugly head again. I'm quite sure that many people are aware that radio transmissions from the scene of the Tippit murder stated that the murderer was armed with an automatic. This is easily determined from the cartridges. Revolver cartridges have a rim that's larger than the case body - that stops the cartridge from moving too far into the cylinder chamber. Automatic cartridges, on the other hand, have a rim the *same size* as the case.

There are two revolver cartridges shown here - can you spot them among the automatic cartridges?
The differences to an experienced police officer are obvious and can VERY QUICKLY be determined... but this caused a problem because Oswald didn't carry an automatic.
via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-40-Refuted
Posted on April 6th, 2017
It's Truly Amusing How Easy It Is...
All you have to do is keep citing & quoting the evidence... and believers just get frustrated and leave.
The list of believers who've run from me is long... although mostly trolls, it also includes believers well versed in the evidence, such as John McAdams, Henry Sienzant, Patrick Collins, David Von Pein and others...
Believers simply cannot explain the evidence in terms of their faith - and get irritated every time I point it out.
The evidence is WELL EXPLAINED in terms of a conspiracy - yet doesn't fit the Warren Commission's theory at all.
Which explains why the Warren Commission simply lied about the evidence they collected.
And despite my posting of the "Provable Lies Of The Warren Commission" for many years now - there's *STILL* no answers to them.
Our most recent believer was posting anonymously as "Hollywood" - although he admitted to being the anonymous "Dale" of the Amazon Forums. Unfortunately, due to childish behavior, Hollywood has been placed in a moderation queue - where any future posts he makes will be censored for his frequent ad hominem attacks.
But my crystal ball tells me that like the previous list of believers, "Hollywood" too will disappear...
The evidence simply isn't in their favor.
via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-It-s-Truly-Amusing-How-Easy-It-Is
Posted on April 1st, 2017
Provable Lies Of The Warren Commission #2
"Mrs. Tarrants stated as best as she recalls, on Thursday night, October 31, 1963 LEE HARVEY OSWALD appeared at the cashier's cage and presented the above check to her and requested that it be cashed." (CE 1165 pg 6)
Notice that yet again, the actual TESTIMONY is in conflict with what the Warren Commission said it was... The Warren Commission had no evidence for Oswald cashing a check on Friday, rather than Thursday - but this wouldn't have fit the evolving storyline. The WC clearly didn't want to provide proof that a Thursday visit to Irving was not unique - for their theory needed a unique visit on a Thursday to pick up a rifle. They simply lied in order to do so.
via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Provable-Lies-Of-The-Warren-Commission-2
Posted on April 1st, 2017
Clinton's Impeachment... Modern Schooling.
Here's the silly statement quoted:
Anthony Marsh Wrote:They already tried to impeach Bill Clinton and failed.
You can find the original thread here.
Now, I hope that no readers in this forum would make such a monumentally stupid assertion. Former President Clinton was impeached - that's merely historical fact. He was not convicted - that's also a fact.
And, like all believers in the Warren Commission, Anthony Marsh has thus far refused to correct his statement, even doubling down on it in the same forum - asserting that: "They tried, [to impeach] but they didn't have enough votes."
Of course, this is the same person who claimed that Dr. Humes burned paperwork in his fireplace on Saturday, then denied he'd said that.
So Anthony isn't an honest person... but clearly - neither is he an educated one.
via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Clinton-s-Impeachment-Modern-Schooling
Posted on April 1st, 2017
Provable Lies Of The Warren Commission #1
Commission finding. - Investigation has revealed no evidence that Oswald and Tippit were acquainted, had ever seen each other, or had any mutual acquaintances. (WCR 651)
"...recalled the person now recognized as Oswald was last seen by her in the restaurant at about 10 a.m. Wednesday, November 20, at which time he was "nasty" and used curse words in connection with his order. She went on to relate that Officer J.D. Tippit was in the restaurant, as was his habit at about that time each morning, and "shot a glance at Oswald." She said there was no indication, however, that they knew each other. (CE 3001)
The WCR lied when stating that there was no evidence that Oswald and Tippit had ever seen each other.
via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Provable-Lies-Of-The-Warren-Commission-1
Posted on March 31st, 2017
Vincent Bugliosi Was A Liar...
"Although Carrico was unable to determine whether the throat wound was an entrance or exit wound, he did observe that the wound was "ragged," virtually a sure sign of an exit wound as opposed to an entrance wound, which is usually round and devoid of ragged edges." - Reclaiming History, pg 413
"Dr. CARRICO - Yes. And this wound was fairly round, had no jagged edges, no evidence of powder burns, and so forth." WC Testimony.
Vincent Bugliosi was a liar.
via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-Was-A-Liar
Posted on March 31st, 2017
Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #39 Refuted.
This is simply another way of saying: "We couldn't honestly state that we found any matches". This is one of the biggest stretches the Warren Commission made - they knew they had a fairly weak case against Oswald, so by framing him with the Tippit killing, they believed that they could influence people to believe the killings were somehow related.
But it really makes no sense at all.
The Warren Commission even went to the trouble of 'expert witness shopping' - since their FBI ballistic experts declined to match any Tippit bullets to the alleged Oswald pistol. They found Joseph Nicol willing to match one of the bullets... however, as Dale Myers (no friend of critics) has written:
Dale Myers Wrote:One ballistic expert, Joseph D. Nicol, did find "sufficient individual characteristics" on one of the four bullets to reach the conclusion that it had been fired from Oswald's revolver to the exclusion of all other weapons. However, none of the eight ballistic experts who have examined the bullets agree with Nicol's positive identification.
You won't find Vincent Bugliosi telling you this...
via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-39-Refuted
Posted on March 31st, 2017
Vincent Bugliosi's 53 Reasons... #38 Refuted.
It's possible... I find the evidence that Oswald owned a pistol far stronger and more credible than that for the Mannlicher Carcano. But owning a pistol that wasn't used to shoot JFK and could not be ballistically matched by the FBI for the Tippit murder is just as credible evidence against Oswald as the thousands of other people in Dallas that day who owned a pistol.
Indeed, the police arresting Oswald all had pistols. The mere possession of a legally owned firearm has never been 'proof' that someone committed a crime.
via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-38-Refuted
Posted on March 24th, 2017
George HW Bush
In fact, I think the entire Bush clan has plead amnesia on this case.
As I patiently wait for this ghoul to die, I wonder how much spoliation of evidence occured during Bush Sr's tenure as CIA director, and how that will affect October's disclosure of documents.
via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-George-HW-Bush
Posted on March 23rd, 2017