Conspiracy JFK Forum Site

(22) Oswald retrieved his revolver at the rooming house.



What was his habit in this regard? Can you give any reason that this differs from his normal routine? It's a fact that the 2nd amendment gives citizens the right to bear arms. Texas is a state where many people routinely carry arms. Are they all suspects when a murder takes place?



Believers such as Patrick cannot honestly admit that this is a downright silly claim that Bugliosi makes. That reflects rather poorly on the honesty of believers...



via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-22-Refuted

I've often said that critics can give credible and often corroboratively supported responses to anything a believer can say.



The same isn't true of believers... I've shown it time and time again here.



So it's time to force believers to prove I'm right yet again...

(21) Oswald's behavior at his boarding house indicates a flight in progress.



Changing clothes when getting home from work is something that I do on a regular basis... should I now be indicted for murder? He changed clothes, then walked across the street, and was last seen waiting at a bus stop.



It's interesting to note that when District Attorney Wade, on Sunday night, held a press conference and described how Oswald had taken a bus - one incredulous reporter asked the question: "Mr. Wade, is this the first time the Dallas Transit Company has ever been used for a getaway car?" CE 2170



Think about that for a moment... you've just murdered the President, and you "flee" in public transportation... and the fact that you've taken a bus is "behavior" that tends to show that you're guilty of murder...



You can't make up stories like that!



via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-21-Refuted

Through your journey to enlightenment, chances are you have grown to understand the consequences of overexposure to fluoride & have become ready to make a healthier lifestyle change.



If you wish to know more about the dangers of this chemical, you could do some reading Here



Otherwise, shift your focus & undivided attention towards learning about 5 simple proven steps that has helped me & many others to reduce fluoride consumption.



http://www.classifiedtruth.com/single-po...e-Exposure





Reducing your exposure to these chemicals will be the best thing you have ever done. I promise you my life changed forever.



Although, we shouldn't have to be worrying about things like fluoride.. We have to bring change.



What are your thoughts??



via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-5-Simple-Steps-To-Reducing-Fluoride-Exposure

I wanted to post the following video:



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jw-AV3eS2A4



I post this video for two reasons: the first is because I believe this is how LNers view the common critic. The second is because this is how believers want others to view us as well.



They speak of conspiracy theorist with disdain. They even say "you people," like we're a race or something. Is there any doubt that when they drafted CIA Document 1035-960, the "kook" stigma was a calculated manufacture?



Sorry, we're not the scared old guy in the video. I'm sure it's fun for believers to pretend so, all while fantasizing of a superior intellect. But it's also fun for believers to run with the Lone Nut fantasty. Believers love fantasy.



via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Understanding-Believers

(20) Oswald had the cab drive past his residence, dropping him off down the road.



This is sheer speculation that isn't based on the evidence... chances are quite good that Oswald never even took a taxi. Indeed, this particular evidence would tend to show that it wasn't Oswald who took the taxi.



Once again we see the presumption of guilt, then an attempt to force the evidence into supporting this 'guilt'.



via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-20-Refuted

(19) Oswald's not speaking to the cab driver about the assassination is striking.



No, it's NOT striking. This is simply another silly statement by Bugliosi... showing yet again his tendency to draw guilty conclusions from virtually any fact.



How many people did YOU not talk to today about Trump winning the Presidency?



The wickedly silly idea that you have to instantly start talking to total strangers about a crime is something only a believer can come up with.



Nor is it particularly credible that Oswald even TOOK this taxi... how credible would you accept the taxi driver's assertion that his passenger was wearing TWO jackets?



It was a necessity to get Oswald off the bus and into a taxi when it became clear that the bus would have given Oswald an alibi for the Tippit murder. But, as we've seen, it's by no means certain that Oswald was on the bus, and certainly far less evidence that he ever took a taxi that day.



[Be sure to note how much difficulty Patrick Collins is having in dealing with my refutations... Where's the 'A' team for believers???]



via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-19-Refuted

Found online...

Judith Levine & Erica R. Meiners Wrote:Twenty years of research has established that people with convictions for sex offenses have low rates of recidivism and that the expanding realms of post-release punishment do not prevent sexual violence.

This is such a blatant and incredibly stupid statement that one would be hard pressed to find a more obvious lie. While I'm sure that if one looked long enough, somewhere there would be a "study" that supports this - it's simply not true.



One can find a justification for anything you believe if you search online long enough...



Journalism & honesty are not words that can often be used in the same sentence...



via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Dishonest-Journalism

From the Washington Post, Nov 17, 2016:

Joyce Carol Oates Wrote:The most notorious of the conspiracy theorists was the publicity-seeking New Orleans district attorney Jim Garrison, who misused his office to prosecute a fellow New Orleans citizen as a conspirator on virtually no evidence (the man was acquitted).

Other than the opening remarks to the jury, Garrison almost never appeared in this case against Clay Shaw.



But the point that refutes this lie is the fact that the CIA and the Justice Department went to great efforts to derail the prosecution of Clay Shaw. Until believers can explain that fact in a non-conspiratorial and credible manner, the facts tend to support the prosecution.



Believers just HATE Jim Garrison - who went far in releasing a great deal of evidence tending to show a conspiracy. This can be seen in Joyce Carol Oates assertion...



via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Shaw-Trial-Garrison-Misused-Office

(18) Oswald left the Marsalis bus when it got caught in traffic.



Presuming that Oswald was on a bus, it's not exactly evidence that he murdered someone if he gets off the bus. It's merely historical FACT that everyone who was on that bus got off of it that same day, and likely within an hour or so - does this make them all suspects???



Watch as believers, such as Patrick Collins - ABSOLUTELY REFUSE to publicly admit just how silly and nonsensical this particular bit of "evidence" is...



Nor will Patrick accuse Mrs. Bledsoe of the crime... it's a provable fact that she also got off the bus... indeed, so did Cecil McWatters... the bus driver... as did Milton Jones, the teenager later identified by McWatters as the "grinning" man he'd originally thought was Oswald.



Is it cowardice by Patrick Collins, or dishonesty? I'll let the readers decide...



It's merely speculation that someone got off the bus -due to traffic- ... nor would it be particularly strange for someone to do so if they weren't willing to wait.



Nor is it particularly well established that he was even on the bus.



One question that is rarely raised is why would Oswald get on the Marsalis bus in the first place? The nearest this bus would take Oswald to his rooming house on North Beckley is seven blocks away. Oswald regularly used public transport, as he didn't drive and had no car. Public transportation has schedules. Anyone regularly using the bus generally knows these schedules. Knowing the schedules helps to not be fired from work. Oswald must have known the schedule of the Beckley bus. It left the St Paul transfer point at the same time as the Marsalis/Munger bus that Cecil McWatters was driving. That time was 12:36pm. McWatters claimed that he was probably ahead of the Beckley bus because he couldn’t see it in front of him. If Oswald was heading back to his rooming house why would he get a bus that didn’t take him there? Especially if the one that did take him all the way home was probably right behind it?



And, if we accept the EARLIEST account, that of McWatter's Affidavit – then Oswald being on the bus is an alibi for the Tippit murder... because he let Oswald off the bus AFTER the Tippit murder.



via Forums - All Forums http://conspiracyjfkforum.com/Thread-Vincent-Bugliosi-s-53-Reasons-18-Refuted